Question: If a meteorite has a collision course with Earth, would it be possible to destroy it (maybe with a nucleur missile, if the pros of that outweigh the radiation made?) or would we just be sitting ducks?
Hi Robina. Believe it or not, people have put a lot of thought into this. The problem is that you can’t just destroy the meteor. Blasting it into lots of pieces just means you get hit by the same mass of meteor. Even when they burn up in the atmosphere, the energy is still being transferred to the earth. There is a strong argument that it would be better to have a single collision than lots of small bits burning up.
To save the earth, you need to actually divert the meteor so it doesn’t hit at all. For that, you want to start while it is further out, and use a series of small carefully controlled explosions. That’s a much harder mission.
Radiation isn’t a problem, since the explosions will need to happen outside of low-earth orbit to do any good anyway.
(Useful trivia fact: They are called meteors until they hit the ground, then they are meteorites. Think of them being smaller by the time they hit to remember).
Hi Robina. Drew is right on this one. I’ve heard suggestions of actually strapping rockets to the asteroid to divert its course, rather than blowing it up. This probably would work, and might work better than explosives, but it could take a lot of fuel. Let’s just hope we don’t have any major asteroids headed for Earth anytime soon. Looks like we may be safe for around the next hundred years or so anyways – we are getting pretty good at tracking those big rocks!!
Comments
bridget commented on :
Plus if you nuked a meteor in space all the bits that would hit the earth would all be really radioactive when they hit 🙂 Not really a good idea.
robina commented on :
Thank you 🙂